In Hindu mythology there are two great epics. One is called Ramayan and other is called Mahabharata. The centre story of both these books is around victory of good on evil. In one story Lord Ram leads his army to defeat Ravana in his land,
While in the second Lord Krishna oversees Pandavas defeat Kauravas in the battle at Kurushektra.
In Ramayan, Lord Ram is the best yodhaa of his side.
He leads his army from the front. Strategizes & directs different people to do things which will meet the objectives. His people are happy to follow orders & want to get all the appreciation for being the best executors. Lord Ram set direction & also tells people what to do during difficult times.
Ultimately they won the war & the final outcome was achieved.
On the other hand Lord Krishna told Arjuna, I won’t fight the battle. I won’t pick up any weapon; I would only be there on ur chariot as a charioteer. And he did what he said. He never picked up the weapon & he never fought.
Still, Pandavas won the war & final outcome was achieved.
So, what was different? It was their managerial style & it was also the type of people who were being lead.
Lord Ram was leading an army of ‘MONKEYS’ who were not skilled fighters & they were looking for direction. While on other hand,
Lord Krishna was leading Arjuna who was one of the best archer of his time. While Lord Ram’s role was to show it & lead from the front,
Krishna played the role of a coach whose job was to remove cobwebs from his protégée’s mind. Krishna couldn't teach Arjuna archery but he could definitely help him see things from a very different perspective.
*Here are some of the basic differences in two styles:*
*Lord Ram- A skilled warrior, lead monkeys, was emotional, gave precise roles & instructions, motivated the army to fight for his cause*
*Lord Krishna: works with best the professionals, provides strategic clarity, allows team members to take lead, fights for the cause of the team, did not depict his true emotions*
*Look at ur team/family & reflect what type of leader/parent u are, One who keeps answering/solving problems for people/kids Or Who asks relevant questions from their people/kids so that they can find their own solution.*
*Are u someone who tells/directs all the time Or*
*Someone who clarifies doubts & allows their people/kids to find their own ways.*
Are u someone who has monkeys in the team & the way u deal with it Or u have the brightest experts in their area getting stuck with issues?
*Younger generation doesn't want you to tell or show how things are done, they want to know the meaning of their task and how it makes a difference in this world.*
They are Arjuna’s who don’t necessarily seek more skill/knowledge but they need someone to clarify the cobwebs in their mind, if u still apply Lord Ram’s style on them, u are bound to fail as a manager.
On the other hand if there are people who aren't skilled enough but rely on ur expertise to sail u through Lord Ram’s style is appropriate.
Isn't it good for us to reflect & think what managerial style will bring the best result for u and ur team/family ?
Is it Lord Ram or Lord Krishna?
The Managing Leader vs the Coaching Leader
Mr Kamaljeet ji